Greeley v. General Seafoods Corp.

1 F.R.D. 532, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1976, 1941 A.M.C. 478
District Court, D. Massachusetts·Decided January 6, 1941·No. No. 1041·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

McLELLAN, District Judge.

This action came on to be heard “on the defendant’s motion for a more definite statement and for a bill of particulars”. The motion is allowed to the extent hereafter stated and is in other respects denied.

It is ordered that the plaintiff file a bill of particulars stating:

1. The respects in which the vessel in question was unseaworthy.

2. What appliances were not reasonably safe and proper and in what respects.

3. In what respects any fellow servant was negligent.

4. The work in which the plaintiff was engaged at the time he received his alleged injuries.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Greeley v. General Seafoods Corp., 1 F.R.D. 532, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1976, 1941 A.M.C. 478 (D. Mass. 1941).

1 F.R.D. 532 (Greeley v. General Seafoods Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bush v. Skidis
8 F.R.D. 561 (E.D. Missouri, 1948)
Stefaniak v. Boland
2 F.R.D. 110 (W.D. New York, 1941)