Greeley Sight Seeing Co. v. Byrne

224 A.D. 752
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1928
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 224 A.D. 752 (Greeley Sight Seeing Co. v. Byrne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Greeley Sight Seeing Co. v. Byrne, 224 A.D. 752 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

Judgment awarding a permanent injunction restraining the president of the borough of Brooklyn and the superintendent of highways of said borough reversed upon the law and the facts and complaint dismissed, without costs. The control and maintenance of the city sidewalks is an administrative matter with the reasonable exercise of which the courts should not interfere. The conclusion reached should not be deemed to indicate that plaintiff has not the right to cross the sidewalk in order to enter or leave its place of business, utilizing reasonable mechanical means to that end. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fanroth v. Byrne
169 N.E. 641 (New York Court of Appeals, 1930)
Fanroth v. Byrne
226 A.D. 673 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
224 A.D. 752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greeley-sight-seeing-co-v-byrne-nyappdiv-1928.