Greco v. General Motors Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Greco v. General Motors Corp.

250 A.D.2d 646, 671 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5507

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 11, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 250 A.D.2d 646 (Greco v. General Motors Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greco v. General Motors Corp., 250 A.D.2d 646, 671 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5507 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered April 8, 1997, as granted the separate motions of the defendants General Motors Corporation and W.R. Robinson Co., Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents.

The separate motions of the defendants General Motors Corporation and W.R. Robinson Co., Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them were properly granted. Each of these defendants established their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law and the plaintiffs failed to raise any triable issues of fact in opposition to their motions (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557). Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered April 8, 1997, as granted the separate motions of the defendants General Motors Corporation and W.R. Robinson Co., Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents.

The separate motions of the defendants General Motors Corporation and W.R. Robinson Co., Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them were properly granted. Each of these defendants established their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law and the plaintiffs failed to raise any triable issues of fact in opposition to their motions (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557). Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.D.2d 646, 671 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greco-v-general-motors-corp-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack