Grecia v. American Arbitration Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Grecia v. American Arbitration Ass'n

306 A.D.2d 479, 761 N.Y.S.2d 512

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 23, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 306 A.D.2d 479 (Grecia v. American Arbitration Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grecia v. American Arbitration Ass'n, 306 A.D.2d 479, 761 N.Y.S.2d 512 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration, the petitioner appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated June 21, 2002, as denied that branch of her motion which was for additional background information concerning the arbitrator appointed by the American Arbitration Association.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The petitioner’s request for additional background information concerning the arbitrator appointed by the American Arbitration Association (hereinafter the AAA) to hear her dispute was properly denied where the AAA furnished a copy of the arbitrator’s resume to the petitioner (see AAA SUM Rules, rule 9). Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, Goldstein and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration, the petitioner appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated June 21, 2002, as denied that branch of her motion which was for additional background information concerning the arbitrator appointed by the American Arbitration Association.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The petitioner’s request for additional background information concerning the arbitrator appointed by the American Arbitration Association (hereinafter the AAA) to hear her dispute was properly denied where the AAA furnished a copy of the arbitrator’s resume to the petitioner (see AAA SUM Rules, rule 9). Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, Goldstein and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

306 A.D.2d 479, 761 N.Y.S.2d 512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grecia-v-american-arbitration-assn-nyappdiv-2003.