Greater New York Savings Bank v. Feder

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Greater New York Savings Bank v. Feder

224 A.D.2d 661, 638 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1954

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 26, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 224 A.D.2d 661 (Greater New York Savings Bank v. Feder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greater New York Savings Bank v. Feder, 224 A.D.2d 661, 638 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1954 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Chaim Feder and Bayla Feder appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Aronin, J.), dated November 14, 1994, as denied their motion to vacate the judgment of foreclosure.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The appellants failed to demonstrate grounds for relieving them of the judgment of foreclosure (see, CPLR 5015 [a]). The appellants failed to redeem the mortgage at issue though given numerous opportunities to do so. We note that the stay of enforcement of the judgment was vacated by decision and order on motion of this Court dated January 17, 1996. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Chaim Feder and Bayla Feder appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Aronin, J.), dated November 14, 1994, as denied their motion to vacate the judgment of foreclosure.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The appellants failed to demonstrate grounds for relieving them of the judgment of foreclosure (see, CPLR 5015 [a]). The appellants failed to redeem the mortgage at issue though given numerous opportunities to do so. We note that the stay of enforcement of the judgment was vacated by decision and order on motion of this Court dated January 17, 1996. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

224 A.D.2d 661, 638 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greater-new-york-savings-bank-v-feder-nyappdiv-1996.