Greater New York Mutual Insurance v. Rankin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Greater New York Mutual Insurance v. Rankin

298 A.D.2d 263, 748 N.Y.S.2d 381

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 22, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 298 A.D.2d 263 (Greater New York Mutual Insurance v. Rankin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greater New York Mutual Insurance v. Rankin, 298 A.D.2d 263, 748 N.Y.S.2d 381 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered July 10, 2001, which, inter alia, granted third-party plaintiffs’ motion to stay arbitration and denied the cross motion of third-party defendants Feathered Nest and David Bench to compel arbitration, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Contrary to the contentions of Feathered Nest and Bench, this matter is not governed by the Federal Arbitration Act and federal law, since it does not involve a transaction in interstate commerce (see Federal Arbitration Act [9 USC] § 2).

Under New York law, the right to compel arbitration does not extend to a party that has not signed the agreement pursuant to which arbitration is sought unless the right of the non-signatory is expressly provided for in the agreement (see Matter of Waldron [Goddess], 61 NY2d 181, 185; Matter of H.I.G. Capital Mgt. v Ligator, 233 AD2d 270). While the hold harmless clause in the sublease containing the arbitration clause here at issue did benefit Feathered Nest, nothing in the arbitration clause itself suggests that the sublease signatories intended to confer upon Feathered Nest the right to compel arbitration of disputes arising under the sublease (see County of Onondaga v U.S. Sprint Communications Co., 192 AD2d 1108). Concur — Tom, J.P., Ellerin, Lerner, Rubin and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered July 10, 2001, which, inter alia, granted third-party plaintiffs’ motion to stay arbitration and denied the cross motion of third-party defendants Feathered Nest and David Bench to compel arbitration, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Contrary to the contentions of Feathered Nest and Bench, this matter is not governed by the Federal Arbitration Act and federal law, since it does not involve a transaction in interstate commerce (see Federal Arbitration Act [9 USC] § 2).

Under New York law, the right to compel arbitration does not extend to a party that has not signed the agreement pursuant to which arbitration is sought unless the right of the non-signatory is expressly provided for in the agreement (see Matter of Waldron [Goddess], 61 NY2d 181, 185; Matter of H.I.G. Capital Mgt. v Ligator, 233 AD2d 270). While the hold harmless clause in the sublease containing the arbitration clause here at issue did benefit Feathered Nest, nothing in the arbitration clause itself suggests that the sublease signatories intended to confer upon Feathered Nest the right to compel arbitration of disputes arising under the sublease (see County of Onondaga v U.S. Sprint Communications Co., 192 AD2d 1108). Concur — Tom, J.P., Ellerin, Lerner, Rubin and Gonzalez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

298 A.D.2d 263, 748 N.Y.S.2d 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greater-new-york-mutual-insurance-v-rankin-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack