Greater Hartford Free Bridge Association v. Greater Hartford Bridge Authority

265 F.2d 656
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMarch 31, 1959
Docket25462
StatusPublished

This text of 265 F.2d 656 (Greater Hartford Free Bridge Association v. Greater Hartford Bridge Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Greater Hartford Free Bridge Association v. Greater Hartford Bridge Authority, 265 F.2d 656 (2d Cir. 1959).

Opinion

265 F.2d 656

GREATER HARTFORD FREE BRIDGE ASSOCIATION, Benjamin H.
Manheim, Individually, doing business as Lincoln
Auto Supply Co., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
GREATER HARTFORD BRIDGE AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 262, Docket 25462.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Feb. 13, 1959.
Decided March 31, 1959.

Leo Parskey, Hartford, Conn. (Parskey, Gross & Kline, Hartford, Conn., on the brief), for plaintiffs-appellants.

John J. Kenny, Hartford, Conn, (F. Timothy McNamara, Hartford, Conn., on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before MEDINA, LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the opinion below. 172 F.Supp. 244. In addition, we note that Section 209.210, Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations prescribes in detail the administrative remedy available to appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
265 F.2d 656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greater-hartford-free-bridge-association-v-greater-hartford-bridge-ca2-1959.