Greater Bright Light Home Care Servs., Inc. v. Jeffries-El

2021 NY Slip Op 06159
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 10, 2021
DocketIndex No. 27552/99
StatusPublished

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 06159 (Greater Bright Light Home Care Servs., Inc. v. Jeffries-El) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Greater Bright Light Home Care Servs., Inc. v. Jeffries-El, 2021 NY Slip Op 06159 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Greater Bright Light Home Care Servs., Inc. v Jeffries-El (2021 NY Slip Op 06159)
Greater Bright Light Home Care Servs., Inc. v Jeffries-El
2021 NY Slip Op 06159
Decided on November 10, 2021
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on November 10, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX, J.P.
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
ANGELA G. IANNACCI
JOSEPH A. ZAYAS, JJ.

2019-10415
(Index No. 27552/99)

[*1]Greater Bright Light Home Care Services, Inc., et al., plaintiffs,

v

Joseph Jeffries-El, et al., defendants, El Equity Corporation, appellant, HSBC Bank USA, formerly known as Marine Midland Bank, respondent (and other titles).


Cordova & Schwartzman LLP, Garden City, NY (Jonathan B. Schwartzman of counsel), for appellant.

Anthony DiPaolo, P.C., Queens Village, NY, for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant El Equity Corporation appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Larry D. Martin, J.), dated June 13, 2019. The order denied that branch of the motion of the defendant El Equity Corporation which was for summary judgment on the cross claims asserted in its amended answer against the defendant HSBC Bank USA, formerly known as Marine Midland Bank, and granted that branch of the cross motion of the defendant HSBC Bank USA, formerly known as Marine Midland Bank, which was for summary judgment dismissing the cross claims against it asserted in that amended answer.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, and the order is vacated.

In light of our determination on a related appeal (see Greater Bright Light Home Care Servs., Inc. v Jeffries-El, ___ AD3d ___ [Appellate Division Docket No. 2018-00553; decided herewith]), we dismiss the appeal as academic.

HINDS-RADIX, J.P., BRATHWAITE NELSON, IANNACCI and ZAYAS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Acting Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 06159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greater-bright-light-home-care-servs-inc-v-jeffries-el-nyappdiv-2021.