Greater Anchorage Area Borough v. Porter and Jefferson

469 P.2d 360, 1970 Alas. LEXIS 189
Alaska Supreme Court·Decided May 22, 1970·No. 1285·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Porter and Jefferson, a partnership, instituted this action challenging the existence of the Greater Anchorage Area Borough. The partnership has been represented throughout by Will Key Jefferson.

The superior court denied the Borough’s motion to dismiss. Review has been sought, and oral argument was heard May 2, 1970. Review is granted.

The partnership of Porter and Jefferson has concededly paid no taxes and does not appear on the assessment rolls of the Borough. For this reason the partnership of Porter and Jefferson has no standing.

The order of the superior court is reversed and the case remanded to the superior court with directions to enter an order dismissing the action.

BONEY, C. J., and CONNOR, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Greater Anchorage Area Borough v. Porter and Jefferson, 469 P.2d 360, 1970 Alas. LEXIS 189 (Ala. 1970).

469 P.2d 360 (Greater Anchorage Area Borough v. Porter and Jefferson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fannon v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough
192 P.3d 982 (Alaska Supreme Court, 2008)
Trustees for Alaska v. State
736 P.2d 324 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1987)
K & L DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. Murkowski
486 P.2d 351 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1971)