Great Woodworking Co. v. Walley

135 Misc. 213, 237 N.Y.S. 374, 1929 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 940
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 14, 1929·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

'er Curiam.

Section 17 of the Municipal Court Code still requires that actions be brought in the districts in which either the plaintiff or the defendant resides or has a place for the transaction of business. Although the specific procedure to be followed where an action is brought in the wrong district formerly contained in subdivision 2 of the section has been omitted from the amended, section the court is required to enforce the statute and change the venue when a proper application is made.

Judgment and orders reversed and a new trial ordered in the Second District, Borough of Manhattan, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur; present, Bijur, Lydon and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Great Woodworking Co. v. Walley, 135 Misc. 213, 237 N.Y.S. 374, 1929 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 940 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

135 Misc. 213 (Great Woodworking Co. v. Walley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roe v. Doe
51 Misc. 2d 875 (NYC Family Court, 1966)