Great Western Bank v. Terio

671 N.E.2d 1271, 88 N.Y.2d 1013, 648 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 3091
New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 19, 1996·Published

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order that affirmed Supreme Court’s order granting plaintiffs motion to discontinue the first foreclosure action, dismissed upon the ground that .it does not lie (see, Hull-Hazard, Inc. v Roberts, 73 NY2d 867); motion, insofar as it [1014] seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that dismissed the appeal from that portion of Supreme Court’s order denying defendant’s motions to vacate the judgment of foreclosure and sale and for poor person relief, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Great Western Bank v. Terio, 671 N.E.2d 1271, 88 N.Y.2d 1013, 648 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 3091 (N.Y. 1996).

671 N.E.2d 1271 (Great Western Bank v. Terio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hull-Hazard, Inc. v. Roberts
534 N.E.2d 324 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)