Great Western Bank v. Terio
This text of 671 N.E.2d 1271 (Great Western Bank v. Terio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order that affirmed Supreme Court’s order granting plaintiffs motion to discontinue the first foreclosure action, dismissed upon the ground that .it does not lie (see, Hull-Hazard, Inc. v Roberts, 73 NY2d 867); motion, insofar as it [1014]*1014seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that dismissed the appeal from that portion of Supreme Court’s order denying defendant’s motions to vacate the judgment of foreclosure and sale and for poor person relief, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
671 N.E.2d 1271, 88 N.Y.2d 1013, 648 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 3091, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/great-western-bank-v-terio-ny-1996.