Great Western Bank v. Terio

New York Court of Appeals

Great Western Bank v. Terio

637 N.E.2d 273, 83 N.Y.2d 901, 614 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1994 N.Y. LEXIS 1096

DecidedMay 12, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 637 N.E.2d 273 (Great Western Bank v. Terio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Great Western Bank v. Terio, 637 N.E.2d 273, 83 N.Y.2d 901, 614 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1994 N.Y. LEXIS 1096 (N.Y. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

On the Court’s own motion, appeal insofar as taken from [902]*902the February 10, 1994 Appellate Division order denying defendant’s motion for reargument or, in the alternative, leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that that order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; appeal otherwise dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the February 10, 1994 Appellate Division order denying defendant’s motion for reargument or, in the alternative, leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed upon the ground that that order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied. Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On the Court’s own motion, appeal insofar as taken from [902]*902the February 10, 1994 Appellate Division order denying defendant’s motion for reargument or, in the alternative, leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that that order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; appeal otherwise dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the February 10, 1994 Appellate Division order denying defendant’s motion for reargument or, in the alternative, leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed upon the ground that that order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied. Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

637 N.E.2d 273, 83 N.Y.2d 901, 614 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1994 N.Y. LEXIS 1096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/great-western-bank-v-terio-ny-1994.