Great West Construction Co. v. Martin Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Great West Construction Co. v. Martin Corp.

19 P.3d 954, 172 Or. App. 490, 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 241

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedFebruary 21, 2001

Docket9607-05717; CA A100353

StatusPublished

This text of 19 P.3d 954 (Great West Construction Co. v. Martin Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Great West Construction Co. v. Martin Corp., 19 P.3d 954, 172 Or. App. 490, 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 241 (Or. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

LANDAU, P. J.

Plaintiff petitions for reconsideration of our opinion, Great West Construction Co. v. Martin Corp., 170 Or App 616, 13 P3d 1016 (2000), in which we reversed judgment of the trial court and remanded the case for entry of judgment in favor of plaintiff on its breach of contract claim. Plaintiff seeks clarification of the effect of our opinion on unresolved equitable claims against other defendants. Plaintiff points out that, in its briefing on appeal, it did ask this court to reverse on the contract claim and to remand for further proceedings on the equitable claims that essentially had been rendered moot by the trial court’s disposition of the contract claim. Plaintiff is correct.

Reconsideration allowed and disposition withdrawn; reversed and remanded for entry of judgment in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $58,775.66 and for further proceedings on remaining equitable claims.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LANDAU, P. J.

Plaintiff petitions for reconsideration of our opinion, Great West Construction Co. v. Martin Corp., 170 Or App 616, 13 P3d 1016 (2000), in which we reversed judgment of the trial court and remanded the case for entry of judgment in favor of plaintiff on its breach of contract claim. Plaintiff seeks clarification of the effect of our opinion on unresolved equitable claims against other defendants. Plaintiff points out that, in its briefing on appeal, it did ask this court to reverse on the contract claim and to remand for further proceedings on the equitable claims that essentially had been rendered moot by the trial court’s disposition of the contract claim. Plaintiff is correct.

Reconsideration allowed and disposition withdrawn; reversed and remanded for entry of judgment in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $58,775.66 and for further proceedings on remaining equitable claims.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 P.3d 954, 172 Or. App. 490, 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/great-west-construction-co-v-martin-corp-orctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack