Great West Casualty v. Nat'l Casualty Co
This text of Great West Casualty v. Nat'l Casualty Co (Great West Casualty v. Nat'l Casualty Co) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604
October 22, 2004
Before
Hon. RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge
GREAT WEST CASUALTY COMPANY, ] Appeal from the United Plaintiff-Appellee, ] States District Court ] for the Southern District No. 03-3520 v. ] of Indiana, Indianapolis ] Division. NATIONAL CASUALTY COMPANY, ] Defendant-Appellant. ] No. 02 C 936 ] ] Larry J. McKinney, ] Chief Judge.
Upon consideration of the MOTION TO CORRECT CLERICAL ERRORS IN THE OPINION, filed on October 18, 2004, by counsel for the appellee,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The court’s opinion in this case, issued October 6, 2004, is AMENDED as follows. The references to Great West in lines 1 and 21 of the opinion are replaced with references to National Casualty. Line 1 should read, "...analysis which National Casualty is proposing..." Line 21 should read, "National Casualty relies heavily on..."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Great West Casualty v. Nat'l Casualty Co, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/great-west-casualty-v-natl-casualty-co-ca7-2004.