Great Plains Insurance Co. v. Midgley

522 So. 2d 550, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 827, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1221, 1988 WL 25785
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 30, 1988·No. No. 87-0163·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND CLARIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

We deny appellant’s and appellee’s motions for rehearing. However, we withdraw our opinion of February 10, 1988 and substitute the following:

We affirm the trial court’s order confirming the arbitrator’s award in favor of appel-lee. However, the trial court erred when it failed to limit the amount of the judgment to the amount of appellant’s policy limits. We reject appellee’s argument that appellant failed to adequately preserve this point for appeal. Accordingly, we reverse that part of the final judgment that awarded appellee $395,000 damages and we remand this case with directions to enter judgment in favor of appellee in the amount of $300,-000 plus interest at the statutory rate.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Great Plains Insurance Co. v. Midgley, 522 So. 2d 550, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 827, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1221, 1988 WL 25785 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

522 So. 2d 550 (Great Plains Insurance Co. v. Midgley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bastien v. State
522 So. 2d 550 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)