Great Plains Insurance Co. v. Midgley

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Great Plains Insurance Co. v. Midgley

522 So. 2d 550, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 827, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1221, 1988 WL 25785

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 30, 1988

DocketNo. 87-0163

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 522 So. 2d 550 (Great Plains Insurance Co. v. Midgley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Great Plains Insurance Co. v. Midgley, 522 So. 2d 550, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 827, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1221, 1988 WL 25785 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND CLARIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

We deny appellant’s and appellee’s motions for rehearing. However, we withdraw our opinion of February 10, 1988 and substitute the following:

We affirm the trial court’s order confirming the arbitrator’s award in favor of appel-lee. However, the trial court erred when it failed to limit the amount of the judgment to the amount of appellant’s policy limits. We reject appellee’s argument that appellant failed to adequately preserve this point for appeal. Accordingly, we reverse that part of the final judgment that awarded appellee $395,000 damages and we remand this case with directions to enter judgment in favor of appellee in the amount of $300,-000 plus interest at the statutory rate.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND CLARIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

We deny appellant’s and appellee’s motions for rehearing. However, we withdraw our opinion of February 10, 1988 and substitute the following:

We affirm the trial court’s order confirming the arbitrator’s award in favor of appel-lee. However, the trial court erred when it failed to limit the amount of the judgment to the amount of appellant’s policy limits. We reject appellee’s argument that appellant failed to adequately preserve this point for appeal. Accordingly, we reverse that part of the final judgment that awarded appellee $395,000 damages and we remand this case with directions to enter judgment in favor of appellee in the amount of $300,-000 plus interest at the statutory rate.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

522 So. 2d 550, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 827, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1221, 1988 WL 25785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/great-plains-insurance-co-v-midgley-fladistctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack