Great Northern Railway Co. v. Roach

242 U.S. 624, 37 S. Ct. 245, 61 L. Ed. 534, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1574
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 5, 1917·No. No. 695·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of Chicago Junction Railway Co. v. King, 222 U. S. 222; Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668; Great Northern Railway Co. v. Knapp, 240 U. S. 464; Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. Whitacre, ante, 169. Mr. A. L. Janes, Mr. E. C. Lindley and Mr. M. L. Countryman for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Ernest W. Michel and Mr. Tom Davis for the defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Great Northern Railway Co. v. Roach, 242 U.S. 624, 37 S. Ct. 245, 61 L. Ed. 534, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1574 (1917).

242 U.S. 624 (Great Northern Railway Co. v. Roach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fluitt v. New Orleans, T. & M. Ry. Co.
174 So. 163 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1937)
MacIntosh v. Great Northern Railway Co.
188 N.W. 551 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1922)
New Orleans & N. E. R. v. Beard
90 So. 727 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1921)
Hines v. Industrial Accident Commission
192 P. 859 (California Supreme Court, 1920)