Great Neck Plaza, L.P. v. Le Peep International, Inc.

275 A.D.2d 342, 713 N.Y.S.2d 122, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8672

This text of 275 A.D.2d 342 (Great Neck Plaza, L.P. v. Le Peep International, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Great Neck Plaza, L.P. v. Le Peep International, Inc., 275 A.D.2d 342, 713 N.Y.S.2d 122, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8672 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for breach of a commercial lease, the defendants Le Peep International, Inc., Le Peep Restaurants, Inc., and Le Peep Grills, Inc., appeal from (1) a decision of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Shifrin, R.), dated June 22, 1999, and (2) a judgment of the same court dated July 20, 1999, which, after trial, is in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the principal sum of $591,987.99.

Ordered that the appeal from the decision is dismissed as no appeal lies from a decision (see, CPLR 5701); and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

[343]*343Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

Contrary to the appellants’ contention, the record supports the Referee’s determination that after the appellants abandoned the subject premises, the plaintiff landlord re-let the premises for its own account rather than for the appellants’ benefit (see, Holy Props. v Cole Prods., 87 NY2d 130).

Additionally, the award of an attorney’s fee was a provident exercise of discretion (see, Burstin Investors v K.N. Investors, 239 AD2d 376).

The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Krausman and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holy Properties Ltd. v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.
661 N.E.2d 694 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
Burstin Investors, Inc. v. K.N. Investors, Ltd.
239 A.D.2d 376 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
275 A.D.2d 342, 713 N.Y.S.2d 122, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/great-neck-plaza-lp-v-le-peep-international-inc-nyappdiv-2000.