Great Bear Spring Co. v. Tartamella
This text of 9 Misc. 2d 303 (Great Bear Spring Co. v. Tartamella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant failed to controvert any of the allegations contained in plaintiff’s affidavit. Standing undenied these allegations are sufficient and no issue is raised. Defend[304]*304ant’s opposition is limited to the claim that the person served was not, at the time, its president. This objection does not survive a general appearance. (N. Y. City Mun. Ct. Code, § 88; Civ. Prac. Act, § 237-a).
The judgment and order should be affirmed, with $10 costs.
Hofstadter, Steuer and Hecht, JJ., concur.
Judgment and order affirmed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 Misc. 2d 303, 172 N.Y.S.2d 179, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/great-bear-spring-co-v-tartamella-nyappterm-1957.