Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Louisiana

305 U.S. 637, 59 S. Ct. 108
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 24, 1938·No. No. 380·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Petition for writ of certiorari [638]*638to the Supreme Court of Louisiana denied for the reason that the judgment sought herein to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it.

Mr. Hugh M. Wilkinson for petitioner. Messrs. Gaston L. Porterie, Justin C. Daspit, F. A. Blanche, and E. Leland Richardson for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Louisiana, 305 U.S. 637, 59 S. Ct. 108 (1938).

305 U.S. 637 (Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Louisiana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fuge v. Uiterwyk
613 So. 2d 717 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1993)
Dickerson v. Hennen
249 So. 2d 251 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1971)
Merrett v. Shreveport Municipal Fire & Police Civil Service Board
72 So. 2d 519 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1954)
State v. Herring
31 So. 2d 218 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1947)