Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Carey

220 F. 454, 136 C.C.A. 282, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2478
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided January 12, 1915·No. No. 114·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only exception in the case is to the refusal of the trial judge to set aside the verdict on the ground that it is [455]*455contrary to the weight of evidence and on other grounds set forth in section 999 of the New York Code of Civil Procedure. Such exception presents nothing for review in a federal appellate court.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Carey, 220 F. 454, 136 C.C.A. 282, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2478 (2d Cir. 1915).

220 F. 454 (Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Carey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jaslow v. Waterbury Co.
296 F. 363 (Second Circuit, 1924)