Great American Insurance Companies v. Bearcat Financial Services, Inc.

90 A.D.3d 533, 934 N.Y.2d 413
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 20, 2011·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Because the first-party complaint alleges that Hayes is liable based only on his own wrongdoing, his third-party claim that he is entitled to common-law indemnification from Dresdner does not state a cause of action (Mathis v Central Park Conservancy, 251 AD2d 171, 172 [1998]). Accordingly, the third-party complaint was properly dismissed.

Because the third-party claim was plainly defective, the motion court providently exercised its discretion in determining that it was frivolous and imposing sanctions and costs (see 22 NYCRR 130-1.1; Pickens v Castro, 55 AD3d 443 [2008]).

We have considered Hayes’s remaining contentions and find [534] them unavailing. Concur — Gonzalez, RJ., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Sweeny and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Great American Insurance Companies v. Bearcat Financial Services, Inc., 90 A.D.3d 533, 934 N.Y.2d 413 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

90 A.D.3d 533 (Great American Insurance Companies v. Bearcat Financial Services, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robinson v. Brooks Shopping Centers, LLC
2017 NY Slip Op 1972 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
AQ Asset Management LLC v. Levine
138 A.D.3d 635 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Freidman v. Yakov
138 A.D.3d 554 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Torres v. 63 Perry Realty, LLC
123 A.D.3d 911 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Bohn v. 176 W. 87th St. Owners Corp.
106 A.D.3d 598 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)