Great American Ins. v. American Rental Ctrs., No. 111315 (Sep. 3, 1993)

Connecticut Superior Court

Great American Ins. v. American Rental Ctrs., No. 111315 (Sep. 3, 1993)

1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 8023

Connecticut Superior Court·Decided September 3, 1993·No. No. 111315·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The plaintiff, Great American, here seeks damages arising out of damages to its insured's grinding machine for which it paid a loss claim and was subrogated.

The court finds the plaintiff has proven by its burden of proof that the defendant was negligent in renting the insured a defective tail lift. Hartmann v. Black Decker Mfg. Co.,16 Conn. App. 1. As a result, the insured's newly purchased surface grinding machine was damaged to the extent of $2,750.00.

The defendants' claims of waiver of liability because of the fine print of the contract are unavailing under the circumstances. See 6 Williston Contracts (Rev. Ed.) 1763A; Rodriguez v. Gilbertis, 33 Conn. Sup. 582. If the presumption of damage caused by the bailee to bailed property applies here, it has been here over some by the plaintiff's evidence demonstrating CT Page 8024 the tail lift collapsed because the lift hinge pin was not welded in place when the lift was used to carry the grinding machine.

Accordingly, judgment may enter for the plaintiff in the sum of $2,750.

McDONALD, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The plaintiff, Great American, here seeks damages arising out of damages to its insured's grinding machine for which it paid a loss claim and was subrogated.

The court finds the plaintiff has proven by its burden of proof that the defendant was negligent in renting the insured a defective tail lift. Hartmann v. Black Decker Mfg. Co.,16 Conn. App. 1. As a result, the insured's newly purchased surface grinding machine was damaged to the extent of $2,750.00.

The defendants' claims of waiver of liability because of the fine print of the contract are unavailing under the circumstances. See 6 Williston Contracts (Rev. Ed.) 1763A; Rodriguez v. Gilbertis, 33 Conn. Sup. 582. If the presumption of damage caused by the bailee to bailed property applies here, it has been here over some by the plaintiff's evidence demonstrating CT Page 8024 the tail lift collapsed because the lift hinge pin was not welded in place when the lift was used to carry the grinding machine.

Accordingly, judgment may enter for the plaintiff in the sum of $2,750.

McDONALD, J.

Great American Ins. v. American Rental Ctrs., No. 111315 (Sep. 3, 1993), 1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 8023 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 8023 (Great American Ins. v. American Rental Ctrs., No. 111315 (Sep. 3, 1993)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related