Greaney v. McKinney Welding Supply Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Greaney v. McKinney Welding Supply Co.

57 A.D.2d 585, 393 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11570

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 18, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 57 A.D.2d 585 (Greaney v. McKinney Welding Supply Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greaney v. McKinney Welding Supply Co., 57 A.D.2d 585, 393 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11570 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, and on the ground of inadequacy, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered February 20, 1976, as is in his favor and against respondent, in the principal amount of $10,000. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The record shows that the verdict was not contrary to the weight of the evidence and that, within the over-all context of the case, the charge with respect to Dr. Bohensky did not [586]*586affect the verdict as rendered (see Coleman v New York City Tr. Auth., 37 NY2d 137). Cohalan, Acting P. J., Hawkins, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, and on the ground of inadequacy, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered February 20, 1976, as is in his favor and against respondent, in the principal amount of $10,000. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The record shows that the verdict was not contrary to the weight of the evidence and that, within the over-all context of the case, the charge with respect to Dr. Bohensky did not [586]*586affect the verdict as rendered (see Coleman v New York City Tr. Auth., 37 NY2d 137). Cohalan, Acting P. J., Hawkins, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 A.D.2d 585, 393 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greaney-v-mckinney-welding-supply-co-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack