Grealish v. United States

20 Ct. Cl. 486, 1885 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 24, 1800 WL 1568
United States Court of Claims·Decided June 1, 1885·No. No. 14311·Published

Opinion

Richardson, Ch. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The claimant, an officer of the Army, having been acting assistant commissary, which is nob of itself an office, but only an assignment to additional duty, for which a compensation of $100 a year is allowed by Eevised Statutes, sec. 1261, is entitled to recover that amount for the sis years immediately previous to bringing this action. The case is ruled by that of Morrison v. The United States (13 C. Cls. R., 1; affirmed on appeal, 96 U. S. R., 232).

No recovery can be had in this court for any period earlier than said six years, by reason of the statute of limitations prescribed in Eevised Statutes, sec. 1069.

Judgment will be entered in favor of the claimant for $600.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grealish v. United States, 20 Ct. Cl. 486, 1885 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 24, 1800 WL 1568 (cc 1885).

20 Ct. Cl. 486 (Grealish v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Morrison
96 U.S. 232 (Supreme Court, 1878)
Morrison v. United States
13 Ct. Cl. 1 (Court of Claims, 1877)