Grazin v. Rockford Corp.
This text of 391 P.3d 914 (Grazin v. Rockford Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Claimant settled his workers’ compensation claim, in part, through a claim disposition agreement (CDA) under ORS 656.236(1)(a). When the insurer, Liberty Northwest, delayed payment of compensation under the CDA, claimant sought attorney fees and penalties under ORS 656.262(11)(a). The Director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services ultimately denied claimant’s request, concluding that, under ORS 656.236(1)(a), claimant waived his right to attorney fees and penalties because he did not expressly reserve that right in the CDA.1
On judicial review of the director’s final order, claimant argues that ORS 656.236(1)(a) is silent on the issue of waiver of attorney fees and penalties under the circumstances presented here and that, in any event, he did not waive his right to fees and penalties under the CDA because the insurer breached that agreement by delaying compensation. In Stoltz v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp., 284 Or App 575, 393 P3d 239 (2017), decided today, we rejected those identical arguments. In that case, we concluded that, under ORS 656.236(1)(a), a claimant who settles a claim through a CDA waives the right to seek attorney fees and penalties for delayed compensation unless that right is reserved in the CDA. Id. at 580-81. Because claimant in this case did not reserve his right to seek attorney fees and penalties in the CDA, that right was waived under the statute.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
391 P.3d 914, 284 Or. App. 613, 2017 WL 1161036, 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grazin-v-rockford-corp-orctapp-2017.