Graziano, E. v. Commonwealth & Nancy Giroux

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Graziano, E. v. Commonwealth & Nancy Giroux

133 A.3d 1, 635 Pa. 180, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 285

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 24, 2016

Docket5 EM 2016

StatusPublished

This text of 133 A.3d 1 (Graziano, E. v. Commonwealth & Nancy Giroux) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Graziano, E. v. Commonwealth & Nancy Giroux, 133 A.3d 1, 635 Pa. 180, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 285 (Pa. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of February, 2016, the Application for Extraordinary Relief Pursuant to King’s Bench Authority is DENIED.

It is noted that the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County has not yet adjudicated Petitioner’s April 2013 petition. The Prothonotary is thus DIRECTED to serve this order on the President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County.

Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of February, 2016, the Application for Extraordinary Relief Pursuant to King’s Bench Authority is DENIED.

It is noted that the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County has not yet adjudicated Petitioner’s April 2013 petition. The Prothonotary is thus DIRECTED to serve this order on the President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County.

Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 A.3d 1, 635 Pa. 180, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graziano-e-v-commonwealth-nancy-giroux-pa-2016.