Graziano, E. v. Commonwealth & Nancy Giroux

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Graziano, E. v. Commonwealth & Nancy Giroux

133 A.3d 1, 635 Pa. 180, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 285

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 24, 2016·No. 5 EM 2016·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of February, 2016, the Application for Extraordinary Relief Pursuant to King’s Bench Authority is DENIED.

It is noted that the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County has not yet adjudicated Petitioner’s April 2013 petition. The Prothonotary is thus DIRECTED to serve this order on the President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County.

Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of February, 2016, the Application for Extraordinary Relief Pursuant to King’s Bench Authority is DENIED.

It is noted that the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County has not yet adjudicated Petitioner’s April 2013 petition. The Prothonotary is thus DIRECTED to serve this order on the President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County.

Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Graziano, E. v. Commonwealth & Nancy Giroux, 133 A.3d 1, 635 Pa. 180, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 285 (Pa. 2016).

Pincite

133 A.3d 1 (Graziano, E. v. Commonwealth & Nancy Giroux) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.