Graziane v. Graziane

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Graziane v. Graziane

72 A.D.2d 638, 421 N.Y.S.2d 128, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13774

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 18, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 72 A.D.2d 638 (Graziane v. Graziane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Graziane v. Graziane, 72 A.D.2d 638, 421 N.Y.S.2d 128, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13774 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Montgomery County, entered August 18, 1978. The appellant applied to Family Court for the modification of prior orders of the court, entered September 17, 1976 and February 1, 1978, which had respectively ordered the appellant to stay away from the former marital residence of the parties and extended the respondent’s exclusive possession of the residence. Specifically, the appellant alleged that he now needed the use of a barn located near the house for business purposes. The Family Court noted that it had previously held that the cases of Hicklañd v Hickland (39 NY2d 1) and Bernstein v Bernstein (36 AD2d 620) were factually inapposite. The record does not conclusively establish any prior or present necessity for the use of the premises by the appellant and as the Family Court found: "I fail to find where there has been any evidence showing a change in circumstances from the last order of this court which would require or warrant modification of the order of this court.” Order affirmed, with costs. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Kane, Main and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Montgomery County, entered August 18, 1978. The appellant applied to Family Court for the modification of prior orders of the court, entered September 17, 1976 and February 1, 1978, which had respectively ordered the appellant to stay away from the former marital residence of the parties and extended the respondent’s exclusive possession of the residence. Specifically, the appellant alleged that he now needed the use of a barn located near the house for business purposes. The Family Court noted that it had previously held that the cases of Hicklañd v Hickland (39 NY2d 1) and Bernstein v Bernstein (36 AD2d 620) were factually inapposite. The record does not conclusively establish any prior or present necessity for the use of the premises by the appellant and as the Family Court found: "I fail to find where there has been any evidence showing a change in circumstances from the last order of this court which would require or warrant modification of the order of this court.” Order affirmed, with costs. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Kane, Main and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 A.D.2d 638, 421 N.Y.S.2d 128, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graziane-v-graziane-nyappdiv-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack