Grazi v. Douglaston Estates, Inc.
This text of 18 Misc. 2d 967 (Grazi v. Douglaston Estates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It was improper to vacate the original judgment which had been directed to stand as security when defendant’s default was opened. This judgment, except as to such portion thereof as is in excess of the amount recovered by plaintiff after [968]*968trial, remains of record and continues unimpaired as a lien against the property of the defendant. (Mott v. Union Bank of City of N. Y., 38 N. Y. 18; Pomeroy v. Hocking Valley Ry. Co., 187 App. Div. 158; Tierney v. Helvetia Swiss Fire Ins. Co., 126 App. Div. 446; MacDougall v. Hoes, 27 Misc. 590; Ingber v. De Friesse, 109 N. Y. S. 2d 419; 7 Carmody-Wait, New York Practice, § 162, p. 422.)
The judgment entered July 11,1958 should be affirmed, without costs. The order dated September 5,1958 should be vacated and judgment of January 22, 1958 reinstated, to extent indicated herein, as of the date of its original entry.
Judgment affirmed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 Misc. 2d 967, 193 N.Y.S.2d 909, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grazi-v-douglaston-estates-inc-nyappterm-1959.