Grayson v. State

148 S.E. 309, 39 Ga. App. 673, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 503
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 14, 1929
Docket19630
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 148 S.E. 309 (Grayson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grayson v. State, 148 S.E. 309, 39 Ga. App. 673, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 503 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. In proving the time of the commission of an offense the State is not, as a general rule, restricted to proof of the date alleged in the indictment, but is permitted to prove its commission on any date within the statute of limitations. Penal Code (1910), § 954.

2. Where one is on trial for the offense of having intoxicating liquors in his possession in a described automobile at a designated point, evidence tending to show that he had such liquors in his possession at another place shortly before the particular transaction alleged in the indictment is admissible as a circumstance pointing to his guilt.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and for no reason pointed out did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloockoorth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ledesma v. State
311 S.E.2d 427 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 S.E. 309, 39 Ga. App. 673, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grayson-v-state-gactapp-1929.