Grayson v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Grayson v. State

771 S.W.2d 289, 299 Ark. 309, 1989 Ark. LEXIS 306

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJune 26, 1989

DocketRC 89-26

StatusPublished

This text of 771 S.W.2d 289 (Grayson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grayson v. State, 771 S.W.2d 289, 299 Ark. 309, 1989 Ark. LEXIS 306 (Ark. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Charles D. Grayson, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Michael L. Allison, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Charles D. Grayson, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Michael L. Allison, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

771 S.W.2d 289, 299 Ark. 309, 1989 Ark. LEXIS 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grayson-v-state-ark-1989.