Grayson, Alonzo Jr.

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: January 30, 2015
• Docket: PD-1603-14
• Status: Published

Opinion

PD-1603-14 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEA'5 ALONZO GRAYSON, JR. § IN THE JAN 30 2015 PETITIONER § § vs. -' § texas Abel Acosta, Clei* § STATE OF TEXAS/ § RESPONDENT. § COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

PETTTTONER'S MOTION FOR SUSPENSION OF RU1LES

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

Comas Now, Alonzo Grayson, Jr., "Petitioner," pursuant

to rule 2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure aRtLoieapfect- fully moves this Court to suspend rule 9.3(b)(1) and with respect COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS JAN 3 0 2313 thereto will shwo the following:

a. statement of the case Abel Acosta,,Cierk

1. Petitioner is pursuing a Petition For Discretionary

Review with this court from a final judgment out of the 296th

District Court of Collin County, Texas and affirmation on appeal

from the Fifth District Court of Appeals in Dallas Texas under

cause numbers 296-81500-2012 and 05-13-00832-Cr respectively.

B. ARGUMENT & AUTHORITIES

2. Rule 2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure

(TRAP) allows this Court to suspend the rules for good cause

shown. Petitioner is an indigent Texas state prisoner and has

no access to any duplication equipment to provide the original

and eleven copies of his Petition with attached opinion from

the Court of Appeals.

Page 1. 3. Petitioner has absolutely no way to provide this Court

with the required copies. He has only one copy of the opinion

which he cannot provide with the Petition as it is needed for

further court review if he is denied relief from the Court of

Criminal Appeals.

4. Petitioner in exercising his First Amendment right

of access to courts respectfully moves this court to suspend

the requirement of providing the original and eleven copies

of the Petition and rule 68.4(i) as he cannot meet the requir

ement of the copies and opinion..

5. Suspension of the two rules will not hinder the review

proceedings or cause any burden on any party. The opinion can

be reviewed electronically and the Petitioner can be scanned

to be reviewed by all Justices of the Court.

C. PRAYER

6. Wherefore, Petitioner respectfully prays this Court

to suspend rules 9.3(b)(1) and 68.4(i) which will give him

effective and meaningful access to the Courts in his Petitioner

for Discretionary Review.

Respectfully submitted,

Along$ Grayabn, Ji Clements Unlt-186^695 9601 Spur 591 Amarillo, TX:79107-9606

Page 2. VERIFICATION

Petitioner under penalty of perjury herein states that

all statments made within this motion are true and correct.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that I have on this 17th day of Janaury,

2015 provided a true and exact copy of this motion on Respondent

by placing the same in the prison mail system postage paid addresed

to:

Wes Wynne, Assistant District Attorney 2100 Bloomdale Red., Suite 20004 McKinney, TX 75071

Alonafo Grayso/n, Jr/,

Page 3.