Grayrock Land Co. v. Wolff

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Grayrock Land Co. v. Wolff

120 N.Y.S. 89

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 22, 1909

StatusPublished

This text of 120 N.Y.S. 89 (Grayrock Land Co. v. Wolff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grayrock Land Co. v. Wolff, 120 N.Y.S. 89 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant claims that the warrant under which the marshal dispossessed the defendant was void, because the proceedings were not initiated and conducted in accordance with the provi-, sions of the Code of Civil Procedure, and the court had no jurisdiction to issue such a warrant. The record of these proceedings was introduced in evidence at the trial, but does not appear among the exhibits submitted on this appeal.

While it was the duty of the appellant to see that the return was properly prepared, we think that, in the interests of justice, the record should be returned to the files, in order that the appellant may have opportunity to correct the return.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant claims that the warrant under which the marshal dispossessed the defendant was void, because the proceedings were not initiated and conducted in accordance with the provi-, sions of the Code of Civil Procedure, and the court had no jurisdiction to issue such a warrant. The record of these proceedings was introduced in evidence at the trial, but does not appear among the exhibits submitted on this appeal.

While it was the duty of the appellant to see that the return was properly prepared, we think that, in the interests of justice, the record should be returned to the files, in order that the appellant may have opportunity to correct the return.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 N.Y.S. 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grayrock-land-co-v-wolff-nyappterm-1909.