Grayer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Grayer v. State

350 S.W.3d 855, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1348, 2011 WL 4940837

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 18, 2011

DocketED 95910

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 350 S.W.3d 855 (Grayer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grayer v. State, 350 S.W.3d 855, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1348, 2011 WL 4940837 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Eric M. Grayer, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Eric M. Grayer, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

350 S.W.3d 855, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1348, 2011 WL 4940837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grayer-v-state-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack