Graydon v. State
This text of 647 So. 2d 1080 (Graydon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Charles Edward GRAYDON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Charles Edward Graydon, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Ettie Feistmann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We reverse an order denying Appellant's petition for post-conviction relief and remand for the trial court to consider, and make findings as to, Appellant's claim that the written sentence does not comport with the orally pronounced sentence.
In all other respects, the trial court's order is affirmed, without prejudice to Appellant's timely filing an amended petition on his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel based upon counsel's allegedly misinforming Appellant concerning the amount of gain time credit Appellant would receive.
HERSEY, STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
647 So. 2d 1080, 1995 WL 7658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graydon-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.