Grayblock Ribbon Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Grayblock Ribbon Co. v. United States

51 Cust. Ct. 200, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3536

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedSeptember 11, 1963

DocketNo. 67976; protests 297264-K, etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 51 Cust. Ct. 200 (Grayblock Ribbon Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grayblock Ribbon Co. v. United States, 51 Cust. Ct. 200, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3536 (cusc 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon ribbon and that the items marked “A” are similar in use to silk pile ribbon, the claim at 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1206, Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), or at 23% or 22% percent, depending upon the date of entry, under said paragraph, as modified by the Sixth Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 54108), was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to be similar in use to fabrics, with fast edges, not over 12 inches wide, wholly or in chief value of silk, were held dutiable at 22% percent under paragraph 1207, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52739), or at 21 or 20 percent, depending upon the date of entry, under said paragraph 1207, as modified by T.D. 54108, as claimed. United States v. Steinberg Bros. (47 CCPA 47, C.A.D. 727), followed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon ribbon and that the items marked “A” are similar in use to silk pile ribbon, the claim at 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1206, Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), or at 23% or 22% percent, depending upon the date of entry, under said paragraph, as modified by the Sixth Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 54108), was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to be similar in use to fabrics, with fast edges, not over 12 inches wide, wholly or in chief value of silk, were held dutiable at 22% percent under paragraph 1207, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52739), or at 21 or 20 percent, depending upon the date of entry, under said paragraph 1207, as modified by T.D. 54108, as claimed. United States v. Steinberg Bros. (47 CCPA 47, C.A.D. 727), followed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 Cust. Ct. 200, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grayblock-ribbon-co-v-united-states-cusc-1963.