Graybiel v. Consolidated Associations, Ltd.

58 P.2d 665, 14 Cal. App. 2d 547, 1936 Cal. App. LEXIS 911
California Court of Appeal·Decided June 11, 1936·No. Civ. No. 1806·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

MARKS, J.

This is a motion by respondent to dismiss this appeal upon the ground that appellant failed to file his points and authorities within the time specified in rule I of the Rules for the Supreme Court and the District Courts of Appeal. The penalty for breach of this rule is found in rule V.

The clerk’s transcript on appeal was filed on April 11, 1936, the notice of motion to dismiss on May 14, 1936, and the appellant’s opening brief on June 6, 1936. The motion to dismiss was calendared on June 9, 1936. The filing of the brief before the hearing of the motion has been held sufficient compliance with the rules to justify the denial of the motion. (Toth v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 113 Cal. App. 55 [297 Pac. 564].)

The motion to dismiss is denied.

Barnard, P. J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Graybiel v. Consolidated Associations, Ltd., 58 P.2d 665, 14 Cal. App. 2d 547, 1936 Cal. App. LEXIS 911 (Cal. Ct. App. 1936).

58 P.2d 665 (Graybiel v. Consolidated Associations, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Southern Counties Thrift Co. v. Rairdon
110 P.2d 679 (California Court of Appeal, 1941)
McClintock v. Robinson
59 P.2d 636 (California Court of Appeal, 1936)
Graybiel v. Consolidated Assns., Ltd.
58 P.2d 665 (California Court of Appeal, 1936)