Gray v. White Mts. (N. H.) Railroad
This text of 56 N.H. 182 (Gray v. White Mts. (N. H.) Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have lately decided that that part of sec. 13, ch. 79, of the act of 1874, which provides for committing certain causes to referees for trial, is not in conflict with the constitution. Copp v. Ilenniicer, 55 N. H. 179. At the time the order was made in the present case, the act was clearly broad enough to include it; but since that time, and while the matter has been pending in this court, the law has been amended by excepting causes of-this sort from its operation ; — and, inasmuch as no commission has been issued and no steps taken for a hearing, we are of opinion that the order of reference should be rescinded, so that the cause may proceed according to the law now in force.
Case discharged.
Cushing, C. J., having presided at the trial, did not sit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 N.H. 182, 1875 N.H. LEXIS 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-white-mts-n-h-railroad-nh-1875.