Gray v. Walter Reed Army Medical Center

D.C. Circuit

Gray v. Walter Reed Army Medical Center

6 F. App'x 3

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMarch 19, 2001

DocketNo. 00-5312

StatusPublished

This text of 6 F. App'x 3 (Gray v. Walter Reed Army Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gray v. Walter Reed Army Medical Center, 6 F. App'x 3 (D.C. Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court [4]*4for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See Fed. R.App. P. 36; D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order, filed July 24, 2000, be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its decision. The district court did not abuse its discretion. See Browder v. Director, Illinois Dept. of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 263 n. 7, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (denial of Rule 60(b) post-judgment motion overturned only if the district court abused its discretion).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI