Gray v. Upp
This text of 1997 OK 98 (Gray v. Upp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
¶ 1 Original jurisdiction is assumed. Let the writ of mandamus issue. The respondent is directed in Oklahoma County District Court Case No. JF-93-1424, styled In the Matter of Sasha Gray, Shawandra Gray, Danyelle Neal, Jr., and Shareka Gray Neal, alleged deprived children, to allow the mother a jury trial on proceedings to terminate her parental rights, pursuant to the Due Process Clause of Oklahoma’s Constitution and this Court’s decisions in A.E. v. State, 743 P.2d 1041, 1047 (Okl.1987) and Matter of D.D.F., 801 P.2d 703, 705 (Okl.1990).
¶ 2 We hold that the 1990 Amendment to Oklahoma Constitution, Art. 2, § 19 neither repealed nor negated the right of a parent to be tried by his/her peers in a proceeding to determine whether there shall be a permanent parting of the bonds linking parent to child.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1997 OK 98, 943 P.2d 592, 1997 Okla. LEXIS 91, 1997 WL 381753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-upp-okla-1997.