Gray v. Upp

1997 OK 98, 943 P.2d 592, 1997 Okla. LEXIS 91, 1997 WL 381753
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided July 8, 1997·No. No. 89519·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

¶ 1 Original jurisdiction is assumed. Let the writ of mandamus issue. The respondent is directed in Oklahoma County District Court Case No. JF-93-1424, styled In the Matter of Sasha Gray, Shawandra Gray, Danyelle Neal, Jr., and Shareka Gray Neal, alleged deprived children, to allow the mother a jury trial on proceedings to terminate her parental rights, pursuant to the Due Process Clause of Oklahoma’s Constitution and this Court’s decisions in A.E. v. State, 743 P.2d 1041, 1047 (Okl.1987) and Matter of D.D.F., 801 P.2d 703, 705 (Okl.1990).

¶ 2 We hold that the 1990 Amendment to Oklahoma Constitution, Art. 2, § 19 neither repealed nor negated the right of a parent to be tried by his/her peers in a proceeding to determine whether there shall be a permanent parting of the bonds linking parent to child.

¶ 3 KAUGER, C.J., SUMMERS, V.C.J., HODGES, LAVENDER, SIMMS, HARGRAVE, WILSON, and WATT, JJ., concur. ¶ 4 OPALA, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gray v. Upp, 1997 OK 98, 943 P.2d 592, 1997 Okla. LEXIS 91, 1997 WL 381753 (Okla. 1997).

1997 OK 98 (Gray v. Upp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of JT
1998 OK CIV APP 131 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 1998)
State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. Trisler
1998 OK CIV APP 131 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 1998)