Gray v. Trent
16 A. 107, 2 Monag. 77, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 831
Opinion
The case before us, as developed in the court below, was one principally of fact, and was clearly and carefully submitted, by the learned judge who presided at the trial, to the jury, and an examination of the several assignments of error reveals to us nothing that can be regarded as erroneous.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gray v. Trent, 16 A. 107, 2 Monag. 77, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 831 (Pa. 1888).
16 A. 107 (Gray v. Trent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Duffy v. McHenry Horse Exchange
12 Teiss. 22 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1914)
Laughlin v. Sontheimer
1 Teiss. 7 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1903)