Gray v. Swope

28 F. Supp. 822, 1939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2438
CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Washington
DecidedAugust 30, 1939
DocketNo. 82
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 28 F. Supp. 822 (Gray v. Swope) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gray v. Swope, 28 F. Supp. 822, 1939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2438 (W.D. Wash. 1939).

Opinion

YANKWICH, District Judge (after stating facts as above).

The petition is clearly without merit.

Its chief ground is that the petitioner’s escape from the Federal Penitentiary on October 10, 1931, while warranting the forfeiture of “good conduct” deduction earned prior thereto, did not justify deprivation of such deduction for the entire first five year term which he began to serve on February 6, 1931.

Ever since the enactment of Section 710, Title 18, U.S.C.A., it has been hekl that the record of good conduct which entitles the prisoner to credits is his record, “for the entire term”.

[823]*823 Absence of good behavior and subjection to punishment forfeits credits for the entire term. See Op. Atty. Gen., 1909, vol. 28, p. 110; Ebeling v. Biddle, 8 Cir., 1923, 291 F. 567; Aderhold v. Perry, 5 Cir., 1932, 59 F.2d 379. See especially Carroll v. Zerbst, 10 Cir., 1935, 76 F.2d 961, where the identical question was decided very recently contrary to the contention here made.

Leave to file the petition in forma pauperis is denied.

The clerk is directed to notify the United States attorney and petitioner of the foregoing ruling.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lesser v. Humphrey
89 F. Supp. 474 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1950)
Grant v. Hunter
166 F.2d 673 (Tenth Circuit, 1948)
Pagliaro v. Cox
143 F.2d 900 (Eighth Circuit, 1944)
Lyons v. Squier
54 F. Supp. 557 (W.D. Washington, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 F. Supp. 822, 1939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-swope-wawd-1939.