Gray v. Summit Assets, LLC

183 N.Y.S.3d 914, 2023 NY Slip Op 01379
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 17, 2023
Docket62 CA 22-00315
StatusPublished

This text of 183 N.Y.S.3d 914 (Gray v. Summit Assets, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gray v. Summit Assets, LLC, 183 N.Y.S.3d 914, 2023 NY Slip Op 01379 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Gray v Summit Assets, LLC (2023 NY Slip Op 01379)
Gray v Summit Assets, LLC
2023 NY Slip Op 01379
Decided on March 17, 2023
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 17, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, MONTOUR, AND OGDEN, JJ.

62 CA 22-00315

[*1]FORRESTAL GRAY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v

SUMMIT ASSETS, LLC, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


PENINO & MOYNIHAN, LLP, WHITE PLAINS (MELISSA L. VINCTON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT D. BERKUN, BUFFALO (PHILIP A. MILCH OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Paul Wojtaszek, J.), entered February 7, 2022. The order denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for injuries that he sustained when he slipped and fell while stepping off the stairs and onto a concrete pad on property owned by defendant. Defendant appeals from an order denying its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. We affirm. Defendant failed to meet its initial burden on the motion of establishing as a matter of law that it did not create or have actual or constructive notice of the defective condition (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]; Salim v Western Regional Off-Track Betting Corp., Batavia Downs, 100 AD3d 1370, 1372 [4th Dept 2012]).

Entered: March 17, 2023

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zuckerman v. City of New York
404 N.E.2d 718 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Salim v. Western Regional Off-Track Betting Corp.
100 A.D.3d 1370 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
183 N.Y.S.3d 914, 2023 NY Slip Op 01379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-summit-assets-llc-nyappdiv-2023.