Gray v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gray v. State of Florida

386 So. 2d 69, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17223

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 29, 1980

DocketNo. 79-1729

StatusPublished

This text of 386 So. 2d 69 (Gray v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gray v. State of Florida, 386 So. 2d 69, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17223 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order revoking probation and imposing two five-year prison sentences to run concurrently with one another for the crimes of aggravated battery, burglary of conveyance, burglary of structure and second-degree grand theft.

Appellant urges reversal of the order and sentences on the ground that the evidence was not legally sufficient to find that a violation of probation had occurred. We find no merit in this contention. The revocation is supported by ample evidence, including his own admission that he had violated the terms of his probation, which the trial court found to be sufficient to support the order of revocation of probation.

We have carefully considered the record, briefs and argument of counsel and have concluded that no reversible error has been made to appear. Bernhardt v.State, 288 So.2d 490 (Fla.1974); Johnson v. State, 378 So.2d 108 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Evans v. State, 356 So.2d 1355 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).

Accordingly the order, judgment and sentences are affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI