Gray v. State
This text of 2013 ND 87 (Gray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 6/19/13 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2013 ND 87
Robert Gray, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20130064
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Thomas J. Schneider, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Adam Lawrence Fleischman (argued) and Blake Dylan Hankey (on brief), 405 Bruce Avenue, Suite 100, Grand Forks, ND 58201, for petitioner and appellant.
Lloyd Clayton Suhr, Assistant State’s Attorney, Courthouse, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, ND 58501, for respondent and appellee.
Gray v. State
[¶1] Robert A. Gray appeals a district court order denying his application for postconviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Gray argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel, he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea to correct a manifest injustice and the prosecution failed to provide exculpatory evidence. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Mary Muehlen Maring
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2013 ND 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-state-nd-2013.