Gray v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Gray v. State

307 S.W.3d 193, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 421, 2010 WL 1255492

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 23, 2010

DocketED 93338

StatusPublished

This text of 307 S.W.3d 193 (Gray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gray v. State, 307 S.W.3d 193, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 421, 2010 WL 1255492 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Lamar Gray appeals from the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief, without an evidentiary hearing, pursuant to Rule 24.035. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Lamar Gray appeals from the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief, without an evidentiary hearing, pursuant to Rule 24.035. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

307 S.W.3d 193, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 421, 2010 WL 1255492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-state-moctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack