Gray v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Gray v. State

103 S.E. 744, 25 Ga. App. 488, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 28

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 14, 1920

Docket11576

StatusPublished

This text of 103 S.E. 744 (Gray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gray v. State, 103 S.E. 744, 25 Ga. App. 488, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 28 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

This case is here upon the overruling of a motion for a new trial, based upon the usual grounds which challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to authorize the defendant’s conviction. The case was by agreement heard by the judge of the city court without the aid of a jury, the testimony offered by the State justified the conviction of the defendant, and the judge believed this testimony in preference to the testimony of the defendant. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

This case is here upon the overruling of a motion for a new trial, based upon the usual grounds which challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to authorize the defendant’s conviction. The case was by agreement heard by the judge of the city court without the aid of a jury, the testimony offered by the State justified the conviction of the defendant, and the judge believed this testimony in preference to the testimony of the defendant. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 S.E. 744, 25 Ga. App. 488, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-state-gactapp-1920.