Gray v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Gray v. State

97 S.E. 201, 22 Ga. App. 797, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 766

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 1, 1918

Docket10090

StatusPublished

This text of 97 S.E. 201 (Gray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gray v. State, 97 S.E. 201, 22 Ga. App. 797, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 766 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

The only point argued in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error is that the court erred in overruling the defendant’s motion for a continuance on account, of absent witnesses. The proceedings upon the hearing of the motion are reported in extenso in the record, and it does not affirmatively appear that the trial judge abused his wide discretion in overruling the motion. '

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, P. J.

The only point argued in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error is that the court erred in overruling the defendant’s motion for a continuance on account, of absent witnesses. The proceedings upon the hearing of the motion are reported in extenso in the record, and it does not affirmatively appear that the trial judge abused his wide discretion in overruling the motion. '

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 S.E. 201, 22 Ga. App. 797, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-state-gactapp-1918.