Gray v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gray v. State

961 So. 2d 1001, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 10402, 2007 WL 1932063

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 5, 2007

DocketNo. 3D07-773

StatusPublished

This text of 961 So. 2d 1001 (Gray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gray v. State, 961 So. 2d 1001, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 10402, 2007 WL 1932063 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Edward Lee Gray appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In his motion, he alleges several grounds of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Gray has raised facially sufficient claims for rule 3.850 relief that the trial court, by summarily denying the motion, has failed to conclusively refute. Consequently, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. On remand, if the trial court again enters an order summarily denying the post-conviction motion, the trial court shall attach written portions of the record conclusively refuting Gray’s claim. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D) (requiring reversal by this court unless the record shows conclusively that the defendant is entitled to no relief).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Edward Lee Gray appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In his motion, he alleges several grounds of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Gray has raised facially sufficient claims for rule 3.850 relief that the trial court, by summarily denying the motion, has failed to conclusively refute. Consequently, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. On remand, if the trial court again enters an order summarily denying the post-conviction motion, the trial court shall attach written portions of the record conclusively refuting Gray’s claim. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D) (requiring reversal by this court unless the record shows conclusively that the defendant is entitled to no relief).

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

961 So. 2d 1001, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 10402, 2007 WL 1932063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.