Gray v. State

861 So. 2d 1233, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18804, 2003 WL 22927362
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gray v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 854 So. 2d 287
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 12, 2003·No. No. 2D02-4453·Published

Opinion

VILLANTI, Judge.

Brian Gray challenges his conviction and sentence for lewd and lascivious exhibition by a person over eighteen to a child under sixteen. We affirm but remand for correction of Gray’s sentencing scoresheet.

Gray’s scoresheet includes 3.6 points for a prior Georgia offense, which the State properly concedes constituted a “noncon-[1234]*1234viction” under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(5)(A). While we find the inclusion of these points on the score-sheet to be error, based on the transcript of the sentencing hearing, we find the error harmless. Accordingly, we affirm Gray’s conviction and sentence but remand for correction of his sentencing scoresheet.

Affirmed but remanded for correction of the sentencing scoresheet.

KELLY, J., and THREADGILL, EDWARD F., Senior Judge, Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gray v. State, 861 So. 2d 1233, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18804, 2003 WL 22927362 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

861 So. 2d 1233 (Gray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.