Gray v. State

732 So. 2d 484, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6766, 1999 WL 330735
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gray v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 742 So. 2d 805
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 26, 1999·No. No. 99-00335·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Edmund Gray appeals the order denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence, filed in the circuit court pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The State concedes that the scoresheet submitted to the trial court is incorrect. On the face of the scoresheet it appears that the prosecution grossly miscalculated the number of points Gray should have been assessed for his prior offenses. We reverse and remand for submission of a corrected scoresheet, and for [485]*485resentencing, if necessary, in accord with the sentencing guidelines.

Reversed and remanded.

BLUE, A.C.J., and FULMER and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gray v. State, 732 So. 2d 484, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6766, 1999 WL 330735 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

732 So. 2d 484 (Gray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.